Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?

X-seq: zsh-workers 41452
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "zsh-workers@xxxxxxx" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 22:04:07 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PcXpEg2goKxs5AvleG5nRc6Jo3jzsp3D2Je1ZYPEIW4=; b=IGmGgUfW+4qkkMyoX3S1DDyQKWuvUa9RKxrmQb3n6jeRnLzDqi6CsyU0ztlnbak6Gn xwXMj/6OApBndSn3TkyniZtLGFK4fs1lsFctow6GnSMSCstJJK7AgsgEz86+s8fMX3UB Cs7jYmmCSB/R2ij9b3IZLH7A2g0kUptaiYeJzYbKkx54R+shYJEG9T3zNczrfc7qBYpb 70fH/GQN1I6iUWGFFpm5WxUqBhn8t3lCSwPTDFH1Y4+vCIUd7T7JxKLgrDlHa61397k5 6LQw3Yo4LTeT1udYWWyLORTFgUNRzPvz5ecK803jRUO95TbgmlbFIMA2giS4K8Qw1EGp Le1Q==
In-reply-to: <etPan.59769e28.2447d90.188@zdharma.org>
List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <etPan.5970cf0e.4c5f2547.6b4@zdharma.org> <etPan.5970eb83.495b9d04.6b4@AirmailxGenerated.am> <etPan.59769e28.2447d90.188@zdharma.org>

On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 6:26 PM, Sebastian Gniazdowski
<psprint@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It's just that I suspect "recurse and forget" tactics in exec.c.

I don't know what you mean by this.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

References:
- Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski
- Re: Can ZWC be optimized, for lesser depths of recursive exec* calls?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author