Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: z parameter expansion flag is broken?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 41661
- From: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: z parameter expansion flag is broken?
- Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 17:42:24 +0100
- Cc: Yuya Amemiya <ghostrevery@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ntlworld.com; s=meg.feb2017; t=1505061745; bh=jIQolgbV/it4eWAOv35OD0Dao90t2iQk4xHaTJ87c2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=dAM7GTjjHafY75f32WIQsXe6RK544XJ3bmIUxj3YFQgyVN07W38TaQyzPbDbmTRUs AP6d1wXJvvLvoUERzHNknm8hFPTCh1noGzaIRmjbcjaxDqgcKbe+elSVttW7R3HBLd JQ2cdGU5Pb8IRWygMeSeMqetbvAC/4g4oEErgzw+V02mJ3ZEYqrlz9Ky1LSPAV3fZn BqJEBHuVqsrtDdi06f1hUDjwKMNTlAUGuwo4vrGLZFxm470gSppkH5lN+rQ4pWA3oj FNo3KxNJaywbumJDEVNmGDaO6YUI0hTJ4No7X+S2hnTZOg3isibD5nhaYgJZ+/WB1D +qAfdspaQtOOA==
- In-reply-to: <20170909.041303.1592547893142420542.ghostrevery@gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20170909.041303.1592547893142420542.ghostrevery@gmail.com>
On Sat, 09 Sep 2017 04:13:03 +0900 (JST)
Yuya Amemiya <ghostrevery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Why does z parameter expansion flag remove leading '-' from result?
>
> in zsh 5.4.1
>
> ```
> $ echo ${(z):--a}
> a
That's a bug, but the only new feature is that it now additionally affects
"-" because that's tokenized. The basic effect is old:
% zsh-5.3.1 -f
% setopt nonomatch
% echo ${(z):-foo*bar}
foobar
Because "-" doesn't usually need quoting, it's more noticeable than with
other metacharacters.
Untokenizing before passing to bufferwords() is the easy fix, and the
result can only be better because anything altered would previously
simply have been dumped by the effect noted by Bart. However, I'm not
at all convinced bufferwords() needs to dump token characters in this
case --- bufferwords() is a hack that originated as a helper for
completion but is now more widely used. A more elegant solution (not on
the cards) wouldn't use bufferwords() at all.
pws
diff --git a/Src/subst.c b/Src/subst.c
index 5b1bf89..5df2a8b 100644
--- a/Src/subst.c
+++ b/Src/subst.c
@@ -3747,11 +3747,15 @@ paramsubst(LinkList l, LinkNode n, char **str, int qt, int pf_flags,
if (isarr) {
char **ap;
- for (ap = aval; *ap; ap++)
+ for (ap = aval; *ap; ap++) {
+ untokenize(*ap);
list = bufferwords(list, *ap, NULL, shsplit);
+ }
isarr = 0;
- } else
+ } else {
+ untokenize(val);
list = bufferwords(NULL, val, NULL, shsplit);
+ }
if (!list || !firstnode(list))
val = dupstring("");
diff --git a/Test/D04parameter.ztst b/Test/D04parameter.ztst
index 3c93990..8dbc1e8 100644
--- a/Test/D04parameter.ztst
+++ b/Test/D04parameter.ztst
@@ -2200,3 +2200,10 @@ F:behavior, see http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=888
>Option
>Regular text
>Option
+
+ (setopt nonomatch
+ print ${(z):-foo-bar*thingy?}
+ )
+0:(z) splitting with remaining tokens
+>foo-bar*thingy?
+
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author