Re: [BUG] Anonymous functions cause funcfiletrace to produce function-relative line numbers

[dana <dana@xxxxxxx>]

On 20 Dec 2017, at 11:39, Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I think this might be going in the right direction.

As far as anonymous functions go, this works well for me. Can't see any problems
with nesting them, having them span multiple lines, or anything. Regular
functions look fine too obv.

(Not sure if this was meant to address the ksh-definitions thing, but just to be
clear, it's still the same there.)

On 20 Dec 2017, at 11:39, Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Probably not much activity till the New Year now.

Happy holidays!

dana