Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [PATCH] [[:blank:]] only matches on SPC and TAB
- X-seq: zsh-workers 42789
- From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane.chazelas@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] [[:blank:]] only matches on SPC and TAB
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 17:31:19 +0100
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FNJW5XPHtzCjFHA5Z04Umqvr2rV+5oLdK7rIlYV1/yU=; b=o05TewPrej0el7A/wOUcIAFrqWV6JMYtXy8Sqhmvaq54eNQ4vtsOcL2tNivEbgZPYZ A3H5WlFOxhlNBArQQi+D/g5JAVsVBSvkNhjM+uGLVn7JzO3F37Vi5/7Qed5uDlZ6SohI eash9izCqRqy7jE5xK3NyzVslLRgKFk6lmtQZw56LNY3SLc5QZZ85hrSzSxw2pb0VnJp lrEqzSJwVFHyEleIi3jcyrSJmaVX0iki9vZYJFRZXtJuK/8IdZrcaMTMMHgNL+DsZ1aJ XqpnNruo4/+a0TkSXPmlT3nQV5FAtvW5hKcDC0rIC0m9QiZGHjt5TBoBYZ36O6uLTeHM vgIQ==
- In-reply-to: <20180516144026.7c21e073@camnpupstephen.cam.scsc.local>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20180514063611.GA7263@chaz.gmail.com> <CGME20180514064505epcas3p1b2f178c595fc9bb962e4094e296ba699@epcas3p1.samsung.com> <20180514064431.GB7263@chaz.gmail.com> <20180514094733.308bff1a@camnpupstephen.cam.scsc.local> <20180514123425.GA19631@chaz.gmail.com> <20180514145056.3eedaea9@camnpupstephen.cam.scsc.local> <20180514155131.GC7263@chaz.gmail.com> <18720.1526411161@thecus> <20180516131547.GA1433@chaz.gmail.com> <20180516144026.7c21e073@camnpupstephen.cam.scsc.local>
2018-05-16 14:40:26 +0100, Peter Stephenson:
[...]
> Is iswblank() guaranteed to be available? It's covered by an extra set
> of #ifdef's compared with the isblank() case but none of them is forcing
> it to use C99 standard headers.
[...]
In that v3 patch, I've added iswblank() in the list of functions
to check before enabling "unicode support". Maybe we should do
like for isblank() so that we can still have unicode support if
iswalpha()... are present but not iswblank() (and have
iswblank() check for spc and tab only then).
OK, I'll send a v4 patch tonight.
--
Stephane
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author