Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: update ghostscript completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 42883
- From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: PATCH: update ghostscript completion
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 09:35:17 +0100
- Cms-type: 201P
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.w1.samsung.com 20180530083523euoutp0295d6d16d528abf20a7303ad0228daafd~zXyf00u-r1721517215euoutp029
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1527669323; bh=fu+hC7Y1O2aTJgjF1gcAqENat4kchaiz68+mxgDgMzc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=to22zXFxNUagggJgTFuXhMluOkuZXSe/P/iwFlS5FsoXa9dnbS/HDsQFQb0h+M3Nk ew/m7BVr+78ztrEcffdO+8rzxgGG+wJ3ARXPoo/4g9YBh+02OPGYuyPZ39OvZlmxeN KdQvCUjD5CSu30z8TxGGF8JxhR7ThcyVcNF73yA4=
- In-reply-to: <13865.1527632525@thecus>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- Organization: SCSC
- References: <CGME20180529222240epcas4p2b7073d0a0bed8d0f7ba32eabd8292175@epcas4p2.samsung.com> <13865.1527632525@thecus>
On Wed, 30 May 2018 00:22:05 +0200
Oliver Kiddle <okiddle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This updates _gs. Any objections if I rename it to _ghostscript which
> is more meaningful and more inline with our conventions?
The only possible problem I can think of is if someone is overriding it
with a function of the same name. But I think even that works OK as if
you have the same #compdef line in differently named functions the one
earlier in the fpath wins. So this looks fine.
pws
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author