Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Zle goes through select() quickly growin # of times
- X-seq: zsh-workers 43041
- From: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Zle goes through select() quickly growin # of times
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 22:25:26 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=6RZLI6wagRXvAUejhz9GjNl1FrtMydQBjK0bax5fwus=; b=ApqGgBrA1wQlISFnRALxrsWTJ1BJGILXxoYxBXMFZYEGDRQhRN3BTdcnhNPZYqWbiY ny4bZ5H1a4IZG/xsvIU9zoA4sr77r52eDxZl0Mpaow+AYqdiq3kINTv+e/ItlnIyidQR P3BFScDtmJUG98c2eqsqFcWDrethEHmObnX2fTgNYSMboiBddqwTOPc3d1Y/cfOXX2QG tlp3yVwLJmly5N4DTtu5Qd4iVvxrgzbbPDsTYLnFFKOy6qiRGW4+os/evzao+m6qgqA8 OhAmW0QjRFgnhC3PdN40Kf1jWSTWhdLW+7YOu5F2+1ejkF8GKPRvPuJPD/7U+AuJGhrs Z7yA==
- In-reply-to: <CAKc7PVCUQD-VK_D-xWVU674HzB0LdthfJPvG6JscKCSqJOVgWg@mail.gmail.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CAKc7PVCUQD-VK_D-xWVU674HzB0LdthfJPvG6JscKCSqJOVgWg@mail.gmail.com>
The forgotten debug prints patch, attached. First file count.txt is
just a proof that I'm not making this up ;)
On 17 June 2018 at 22:23, Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm debugging the reason why Ctrl-C can be ignored. U stumbled upon this:
>
> 1. I open shell, enter "ls ", then press Ctrl-C
> 2. Debug logs from before "< master Zle select()" and after "> master
> Zle select()" occur
> 3. At first Ctrl-C, there are 24 select() recurrent code execution
> paths – the logs around select() are triggered ~24 times.
> 4. At second "ls <Ctrl-C>", there are 96 recurrent code paths.
> 5. At third "ls <Ctrl-C>, there are 197 recurrent code paths.
>
> The logs are:
>
> BASIC < select Before: selret: 0, errflag: 0, retflag: 0, breaks: 0,
> exit_pending: 0
> BASIC > select After: selret: 0, errflag: 0, retflag: 0, breaks: 0,
> exit_pending: 0
>
> two lines, installed before master select() (first line) and after the
> master select (second line).
>
> Could it be that Zsh reacts in this way after occurring Ctrl-C? It's
> somewhat hard to believe. That's why I include also patch with debug
> prints that I've used. Maybe someone will just apply it and do "ls
> <Ctrl-C>".
>
> Also: asciinema recording, showing how the series of logs grow (1 tmux
> screen / page, then 4 tmux screens / pages, then 9 pages to scroll up
> to see the logs beginnings'):
>
> https://asciinema.org/a/hC24KqphbztwQfk5ApZbOYU2y
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sebastian Gniazdowski
diff --git a/Src/Zle/zle_main.c b/Src/Zle/zle_main.c
index b78c47e..d95eaad 100644
--- a/Src/Zle/zle_main.c
+++ b/Src/Zle/zle_main.c
@@ -343,8 +343,12 @@ static int kungetsz;
void
ungetbyte(int ch)
{
- if (kungetct == kungetsz)
+ if (kungetct == kungetsz) {
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "== kungetct: %d, kungetsz: %d\n == ... realloc kungetsz*2 :: ", kungetct, kungetsz );
kungetbuf = realloc(kungetbuf, kungetsz *= 2);
+ } else {
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "== kungetct: %d, kungetsz: %d\n == ... NO realloc:: ", kungetct, kungetsz );
+ }
kungetbuf[kungetct++] = ch;
}
@@ -527,6 +531,7 @@ raw_getbyte(long do_keytmout, char *cptr)
*/
if ((nwatch || tmout.tp != ZTM_NONE)) {
#if defined(HAVE_SELECT) || defined(HAVE_POLL)
+#warning Yes, declaring selret ---------------------
int i, errtry = 0, selret;
# ifdef HAVE_POLL
int nfds;
@@ -581,9 +586,15 @@ raw_getbyte(long do_keytmout, char *cptr)
else
poll_timeout = -1;
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "BASIC <poll Before[poll]: selret: %d, errflag: %d, retflag: %d, breaks: %d, exit_pending: %d\n",
+ selret, errflag, retflag, breaks, exit_pending );
+
winch_unblock();
selret = poll(fds, errtry ? 1 : nfds, poll_timeout);
winch_block();
+
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "BASIC >poll After[poll]: selret: %d, errflag: %d, retflag: %d, breaks: %d, exit_pending: %d\n",
+ selret, errflag, retflag, breaks, exit_pending );
# else
int fdmax = SHTTY;
struct timeval *tvptr;
@@ -611,10 +622,16 @@ raw_getbyte(long do_keytmout, char *cptr)
else
tvptr = NULL;
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "BASIC < select Before: selret: %d, errflag: %d, retflag: %d, breaks: %d, exit_pending: %d\n",
+ selret, errflag, retflag, breaks, exit_pending );
+
winch_unblock();
selret = select(fdmax+1, (SELECT_ARG_2_T) & foofd,
NULL, NULL, tvptr);
winch_block();
+
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "BASIC > select After: selret: %d, errflag: %d, retflag: %d, breaks: %d, exit_pending: %d\n",
+ selret, errflag, retflag, breaks, exit_pending );
# endif
/*
* Make sure a user interrupt gets passed on straight away.
@@ -864,10 +881,16 @@ getbyte(long do_keytmout, int *timeout)
lastchar_wide_valid = 0;
#endif
- if (kungetct)
+ if (kungetct) {
ret = STOUC(kungetbuf[--kungetct]);
- else {
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "== DIRECT! kungetct: %d, kungetsz: %d\n == ... continuing:: "
+ "errflag: %d, retflag: %d, breaks: %d, exit_pending: %d\n",
+ kungetct, kungetsz,
+ errflag, retflag, breaks, exit_pending );
+ } else {
for (;;) {
+ fprintf( fopen("/tmp/reply", "a"), "== FOR (;;)! kungetct: %d, kungetsz: %d\n == ... continuing:: \n",
+ kungetct, kungetsz );
int q = queue_signal_level();
dont_queue_signals();
r = raw_getbyte(do_keytmout, &cc);
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author