Re: clang completion

[Eric Cook <llua@xxxxxxx>]

On 07/08/2018 08:40 AM, Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> Daniel wrote:
> 
>> Note that it's not trivial to support _approximate or _correct here, because
>> the --autocomplete contract is "give me a prefix", not "give me all possible
>> matches for me to sort out".  That is: clang wants to do the matching itself,
>> and it doesn't honour zstyle's.
> 
> This sort of design tends to follow from the way bash programmable
> completion is designed. I'd far prefer to have clear options for listing
> all warnings, languages, options etc. Those potentially have wider uses.
> 

Do you mind further expanding upon this? so people considering this option
can be directed to a location of why this may not be desired for other shells.