Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Perplexing `COMP_POINT` value on bashcompinit tab completion
- X-seq: zsh-workers 43198
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "zsh-workers@xxxxxxx" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Perplexing `COMP_POINT` value on bashcompinit tab completion
- Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 17:27:13 -0700
- Cc: "Saverio M." <saverio.pub2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8qZWrBciBG6+iFIxZCuHISvp1uT9WFmFJZy1m/oQiI0=; b=I0Fzg80nNXEMJdAruQQlh8OvxuHEz5ajY66W8gJpKBjHDXjgrFTxJMGisPC5GDSx0c nTvmkDNisvuGD937hzBV80DhSpeU6/fplytR+E7PS4C8Cvb9tJJjjljgxYia4MA/k8yF Ez6/MOI2V0V6vnBCmsCorESxcdgk42/Q01a8dLKMBXm+fdNW7SxRasd1fU1diCsS4tSx SbjarI+dhZBR8+uCU1EyCgWwa6PWU8T3n8iix844fQeT1U7+M/PS6iZ4JRy/7OJEHtzG 9Te8zTxj0ElotTngdrBvDRmWs0+weQfID9wuYtxJzK8T4hbkfjsibK1tlN5d4bxGIjic kZ0g==
- In-reply-to: <20180721111514.GA6123@primenet.com.au>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20180721111514.GA6123@primenet.com.au>
On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 4:15 AM, Geoff Wing <gcw@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hmm, did this get trapped as spam or something? Why did Geoff need to
forward it?
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "Saverio M." <saverio.pub2@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:31:02 +0200
> Subject: Perplexing `COMP_POINT` value on bashcompinit tab completion
> Hello!
>
> I use the OMZ/`bashcompinit` combination in order to write my tab completion scripts.
I'll note that as soon as you introduce OMZ, things get a little
murky, because it sets a bunch of options and key mappings that may
change some expected behavior.
> When typing:
>
> ```sh
> $ scr <tab>
> ```
>
> Bash sends to the completion script the env vars `COMP_LINE=scr ` and `COMP_POINT=4`. The number `4` is, intuitively, the position of the cursor (and the size of the `COMP_LINE` string).
>
> Zsh sends `COMP_LINE=/home/oooh_my_tab/scr `, which is different while correct nonetheless, but sends `COMP_POINT=23`, which is perplexing, since the position of the cursor is `22`.
I'm not sure why zsh is expanding the full path to "scr" here (see
above about OMZ), but:
I'm fairly certain this happens because arrays in bash are
zero-base-indexed, whereas arrays in zsh are one-base-indexed. So the
position of the cursor is after the 22 characters in the line, at
$BUFFER[23]. Even if you have the KSH_ARRAYS option set in the
interactive context to revert to zero-based arrays, completion uses
zsh default context with one-based arrays.
COMP_POINT is computed like this:
(( COMP_POINT = 1 + ${#${(j. .)words[1,CURRENT-1]}} + $#QIPREFIX +
$#IPREFIX + $#PREFIX ))
However, "1 +" is probably wrong here because the stand-in for compgen
re-asserts KSH_ARRAYS. There was an attempt to fix this in
zsh-workers articles 31031 to 30137 but the wrong fix was done, it
changed the number of words examined (causing a different bug) rather
than remove the "1 +" offset calculation in the assignment to
COMP_POINT. The new bug was noticed and reverted to the previous
behavior, which restored the original bug.
> When typing:
>
> ```sh
> $ scr a<tab>
> ```
>
> Zsh sends `COMP_LINE=/home/oooh_my_tab/scr a`, and the now more perplexing `COMP_POINT=25`, which adds an unexpected extra unit to what was, in the previous example, an already apparently off-by-one value.
I don't see any obvious reason for this in the current sources, but
what version of zsh do you have? The "different bug" I mention above
was present from November 2013 to January 2017 and fixed in zsh
version 5.4.2, and that bug might explain the additional offset.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author