Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Parse error (lack thereof) on incomplete loops
- X-seq: zsh-workers 43603
- From: Marc Chantreux <eiro@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Parse error (lack thereof) on incomplete loops
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 22:04:25 +0200
- Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 aurora-borealis.phear.org 5365E106B1
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=phear.org; s=20180217; t=1538683467; bh=uPNitpqeVxmTsmim4AvD8xpbf9V937YmSazpNMVlD0w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lg5fbeh5Pg8PmknDeSQ4oCa0IGgQrrzF6NcKZygyV4zUjlpuGHvEMi3z0SovhfpmL iquj89g8a2s1tzEsRUbo1HcmegB0kiF/fGdzmIzbS7/Niq2K9x4/a8Eat6jJ3DLGMV Y6Q2YQ/Ss75UMEAdaCV1xSHFmk9poYce/qVyJGhPYHWcnoMp25fj4zmfHHZIywASM6 3eG+flrmAx2v1Wwq+7Zjirnzu7gfEhjkafDx/Aqr/4FaQtoaAwIjDtHp6ypPoJS0OB xo1rvsvijWULd3gtCGmJJVzvMeOQW5B+GGcjXAly3bhb+Jh8ALMRJWa6NXPO4J9sj6 WpD5lqp1xjhsA==
- In-reply-to: <20181004163158eucas1p234a045be013b5463d8db44314ed217dc~adN28lJmq0822408224eucas1p2F@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <CGME20181004154947epcas4p2441e109a2c4e060bf39f0f6925e98241@epcas4p2.samsung.com> <CAH+w=7awbwDuX2RXcB7pK6Hhbi8fjs=NvwkTAEGmY7gvNpLCqA@mail.gmail.com> <20181004163158eucas1p234a045be013b5463d8db44314ed217dc~adN28lJmq0822408224eucas1p2F@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
hello Peter,
Again: thanks for your amazing job Bart and you did on zsh.
> However, I'm very far from convinced this is actually a bug. If you
> turn off SHORT_LOOPS you'll find you get the error back; the
is there a way to turn it off from configuration? it looks like an
option in the manual but
setopt noshortloop
gives me
setopt: no such option: noshortloop
> I'm therefore inclined to leave it alone since the SHORT_LOOPS user
> (Marc) is perfectly happy with it and a lot of us avoid the alternative
> syntax like the plague.
is it just because people don't like it or are there technical reasons
to avoid it?
regards
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author