Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: A cute bug involving aliases and _remote_files
- X-seq: zsh-workers 44086
- From: Peter Stephenson <p.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: A cute bug involving aliases and _remote_files
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 09:40:26 +0000
- Cms-type: 201P
- Dkim-filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.w1.samsung.com 20190226094029euoutp02d32f616f1976d08583cd8424cc858530~G4I_nNl7i0909009090euoutp02I
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1551174029; bh=ffomBhrt9oi0CMpBzuCe0d2N/dZazNsb3MpobfXR9RQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jkzBOmOXJSkkczJbfY4VzhtmcZ2iE37r9TPlWvNSmmxYLzU27R2uZAzTk8JCkG+nA F8s3tiEHb/jNYpgcb5o2OsQRHzs+4mUFQOe76cmTVmTWN74W5xDR1DSdEm1lFqguwf bFTyAdIBZMAtfQiZ6Tfc/JzshROdbg3gKUnMyPV4=
- In-reply-to: <3D38E0FC-DE43-4CFD-86E2-B258D9DA816C@dana.is>
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <0d066d726a76a85461089339e25e207663d389b7.camel@fifi.org> <CGME20190226092413epcas1p15c71265504fc43d80d08f00a321224e3@epcas1p1.samsung.com> <3D38E0FC-DE43-4CFD-86E2-B258D9DA816C@dana.is>
On Tue, 2019-02-26 at 03:23 -0600, dana wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 20:49, Philippe Troin <phil@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Would it make sense to use "command ls" instead of "ls" for remote
> > directory listings in _remote_files? That would make sure that no
> > aliases nor functions are involved.
> That *seems* reasonable...?
Looks to me like that's probably a good rule of thumb any time you're
relying on a bunch of specific arguments to a command... But ls is
particularly often aliased.
pws
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author