Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
different colorization style in Emacs and VTs
- X-seq: zsh-workers 44379
- From: Emanuel Berg <moasenwood@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: different colorization style in Emacs and VTs
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 21:53:37 +0200
- Cancel-lock: sha1:1ZMiInBHPYh5BY+0a+K/MM26OCo=
- List-help: <mailto:zsh-workers-help@zsh.org>
- List-id: Zsh Workers List <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:zsh-workers-unsubscribe@zsh.org>
- Mail-copies-to: never
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
When I do `M-x shell RET' in Emacs I get a zsh
that I think is prettier and perhaps even
faster (?) than when I just invoke it in the/a
Linux VT. Is it somehow post-processed by Emacs
and the difference has nothing to do with zsh
or why doesn't it look like that in the VTs?
I know about dircolors but it doesn't seem to
give the cool, interactive feel about Emacs
colors with zsh: when you, for example do
-flags, that actually ends up with
`font-lock-comment-face' (but not the rest of
the input or general buffer text) That
name/face choise perhaps doesn't make much
sense, but the color matters. Can I get this in
the VTs as well?
TIA
PS. I know how to set up the colors in Emacs
and the VTs. Just not what makes zsh look
different. And I like the Emacs version
more. DS.
--
underground experts united
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author