Re: [PATCH] find RLIM_NLIMITS correctly on Cygwin

[Jun T <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 2020/02/27 22:22, Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Jun T wrote on Tue, 25 Feb 2020 18:38 +0900:
>> We may hope that a user who sees
>> UNKNOWN in the output of limit/ulimit will report it to us, or
>> add a simple test like
>> 
>> limit | grep UNKNOWN || print OK
>> 
>> somewhere in the test (but in which .ztst file?).
> 
> I prefer a new test, but to arrange things in such a way that a failure
> of the new test won't fail the build or prevent other tests from
> running.
(snip)
> We might even add a new flag, e.g., «ZTST_failure_is_fatal=false»

Currently each test chunk can have flags 'd' 'D' 'q' and 'f'.
We can add a new flag, say 'n', to make the failure not fatal.