Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Possible bug: HASH_CMDS has no observable effect
- X-seq: zsh-workers 47376
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Roman Perepelitsa <roman.perepelitsa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Possible bug: HASH_CMDS has no observable effect
- Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 13:43:08 -0700
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/47376>
- Archived-at: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/zsh-workers/2020-09/CAH%2Bw%3D7bLchb-1tn2NsfiJ2qer9vGtbM7ZGte6wBTB%2Bos1RYC-Q%40mail.gmail.com>
- Authentication-results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (mail-ot1-f48.google.com) smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.48; dkim=pass header.d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.a=rsa-sha256; dmarc=none header.from=brasslantern.com; arc=none
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=brasslantern-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LsED+ig04z8GY6sXMeE0SwBIGB3OFdcbiqLD9p2J7WA=; b=EVgJxXPYu2BCuEBh2LsUIP3DJfJ8ASxoHmcXgARvLIUxAXGh/W5/WcpUnzFw6Q6QDu LSaAj6yh2iytwYFmisysCd0Bz/x9DfpuKDVzk02sBGfXq9XKTnh8o7UHAmdWclbvkfeA dcym1Vnyoi+sP4ZV+7fEOAETOGRccoWe09ZMvFqAbtEd6zeIaoijvulFF4Q3jfsaHIbO sCjV/AzTzvLT+68SbSy9RasyAWLYPbxpOhDQpbfktXm7WT0odEr+5rDQzphz17+tDypx B2Qkgk7K+DsQun5eNim12TEYSwJhyWWHdwcrMzi3bnNLoEY1GplZEz+70BrV03eTG6mK OnBA==
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7aBwDz_Uo4r2ohv9wLBpeHna2C9g0QGN5FsXmqs8Hh2CA@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arc/zsh-workers>
- List-help: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=help>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-owner: <mailto:zsh-workers-request@zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=subscribe%20zsh-workers>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=unsubscribe%20zsh-workers>
- References: <CAN=4vMqM-2Vu0n+QTbA9B_9z=3DKDdiOKbDRRaGGOG2rbY7-jA@mail.gmail.com> <20200911144852.GA1669764@fullerene.field.pennock-tech.net> <CAN=4vMrFhmKitKbdPdabZ1Ey9cjmEf62GVaGVMxn6T9AjZVc8Q@mail.gmail.com> <20200911161000.GA1679994@fullerene.field.pennock-tech.net> <CAN=4vMq-prFqopCW8apuYO8YUnuKL8G=WX+jBXFwgiFkfY=5Pw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7Y2VQpidVcinSXkQQqng0XjOwYtWL7a8jiYFx+te7fQCw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMrC2QjfxWaPUE9QS9tENBu=7BB=Hmp5rY6SaFahFThq=Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7YDbOLz8Vp9v1tuweX9rGynS19GQ3FDiSryvqX=iz2sNA@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMr0ucdLxfb+GMevBVT-=u1oNRr+Tc9EEVKizkeQC5tL7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7aBwDz_Uo4r2ohv9wLBpeHna2C9g0QGN5FsXmqs8Hh2CA@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: zsh-workers-request@xxxxxxx
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 1:41 PM Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Eventually every directory in the path will have been scanned, and
> cache misses become immediately "not found". If HASH_DIRS is not set
> (but HASH_CMDS is).
Sorry, unintentional sentence fragment. "... then all the directories
are always rescanned on a cache miss."
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author