Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: More rabbit-holes with unset variables
- X-seq: zsh-workers 47644
- From: Stephane Chazelas <stephane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: More rabbit-holes with unset variables
- Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 20:49:59 +0000
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/47644>
- Archived-at: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/zsh-workers/2020-11/20201126204959.svi7k77gz2nfytmc%40chazelas.org>
- Authentication-results: zsh.org; iprev=pass (relay11.mail.gandi.net) smtp.remote-ip=217.70.178.231; dmarc=none header.from=chazelas.org; arc=none
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7bs9E7whJLugMLOXG05R-2S8Hjt+OOKK_KN+SMxv-Vvaw@mail.gmail.com>
- List-archive: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arc/zsh-workers>
- List-help: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=help>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- List-owner: <mailto:zsh-workers-request@zsh.org>
- List-post: <mailto:zsh-workers@zsh.org>
- List-subscribe: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=subscribe%20zsh-workers>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:sympa@zsh.org?subject=unsubscribe%20zsh-workers>
- Mail-followup-to: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- References: <CAH+w=7Zag5MG5D=cRS2UMSsqJ0t=iw5MH9j8=HBO1Q77nbs03w@mail.gmail.com> <20201125131921.vay7h3xk5qn4odgg@chazelas.org> <CAMP44s0-ki=TBzTwnqx10FcTLX4mbphwN88UCx0+h97JTecBWA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7bs9E7whJLugMLOXG05R-2S8Hjt+OOKK_KN+SMxv-Vvaw@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: zsh-workers-request@xxxxxxx
2020-11-26 12:41:31 -0800, Bart Schaefer:
[...]
> Is there a newer version of the standard than V4 from 2018, which is
> the latest I can find online?
[...]
To answer that specific question, the next major version
(issue8) of the standard is currently in draft stage. A draft1
has been released and undergone a review stage now completed.
There is a draft1.1 which can be downloaded from the opengroup
once you create an account, see
https://www.mail-archive.com/austin-group-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg06965.html
for details.
In any case, sh "local" scope won't be included in that version
of the standard. We'll probably need to wait another decade or
so for that.
--
Stephane
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author