Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
[PATCH] Add leading '-' to zparseopts option parsing errors
- X-seq: zsh-workers 47905
- From: Joshua Krusell <js.shirin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Cc: Joshua Krusell <js.shirin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [PATCH] Add leading '-' to zparseopts option parsing errors
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:46:59 +0100
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/47905>
- Archived-at: <http://www.zsh.org/sympa/arcsearch_id/zsh-workers/2021-02/20210203154659.466091-1-js.shirin%40gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
This only affects error messages associated with parsing positional
parameters. Error messages from parsing option specs are kept as is
without the leading dash to match how options are defined when calling
zparseopts.
---
This would be the new behaviour:
% set -- -h
% zparseopts -- h:
zparseopts: no default array defined: h:
% zparseopts -a foo -- h h
zparseopts: option defined more than once: h
% zparseopts -- h:=foo
zparseopts: missing argument for option: -h
I'm not sure this reduces ambiguity besides the example that Daniel
mentioned earlier.
% set -- --x
% zparseopts -F -- x:=foo
zparseopts: bad option: --x
/Joshua
Src/Modules/zutil.c | 8 ++++----
Test/V12zparseopts.ztst | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Src/Modules/zutil.c b/Src/Modules/zutil.c
index c8017d0c0..cecea6d51 100644
--- a/Src/Modules/zutil.c
+++ b/Src/Modules/zutil.c
@@ -1874,9 +1874,9 @@ bin_zparseopts(char *nam, char **args, UNUSED(Options ops), UNUSED(int func))
if (!(d = sopts[STOUC(*o)])) {
if (fail) {
if (*o != '-')
- zwarnnam(nam, "bad option: %c", *o);
+ zwarnnam(nam, "bad option: -%c", *o);
else
- zwarnnam(nam, "bad option: %s", o);
+ zwarnnam(nam, "bad option: -%s", o);
return 1;
}
o = NULL;
@@ -1889,7 +1889,7 @@ bin_zparseopts(char *nam, char **args, UNUSED(Options ops), UNUSED(int func))
} else if (!(d->flags & ZOF_OPT) ||
(pp[1] && pp[1][0] != '-')) {
if (!pp[1]) {
- zwarnnam(nam, "missing argument for option: %s",
+ zwarnnam(nam, "missing argument for option: -%s",
d->name);
return 1;
}
@@ -1916,7 +1916,7 @@ bin_zparseopts(char *nam, char **args, UNUSED(Options ops), UNUSED(int func))
else if (!(d->flags & ZOF_OPT) ||
(pp[1] && pp[1][0] != '-')) {
if (!pp[1]) {
- zwarnnam(nam, "missing argument for option: %s",
+ zwarnnam(nam, "missing argument for option: -%s",
d->name);
return 1;
}
diff --git a/Test/V12zparseopts.ztst b/Test/V12zparseopts.ztst
index c41c49022..816e1d041 100644
--- a/Test/V12zparseopts.ztst
+++ b/Test/V12zparseopts.ztst
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@
} $=1
done
0:zparseopts -F
-?(anon):zparseopts:2: bad option: x
+?(anon):zparseopts:2: bad option: -x
>ret: 1, optv: , argv: -a -x -z
-?(anon):zparseopts:2: bad option: x
->ret: 1, optv: , argv: -ax -z
?(anon):zparseopts:2: bad option: -x
+>ret: 1, optv: , argv: -ax -z
+?(anon):zparseopts:2: bad option: --x
>ret: 1, optv: , argv: -a --x -z
for 1 in '-a 1 2 3' '1 2 3'; do
@@ -168,5 +168,5 @@
print -r - ret: $?, optv: $optv, argv: $argv
} -ab1 -c
0:missing optarg
-?(anon):zparseopts:2: missing argument for option: c
+?(anon):zparseopts:2: missing argument for option: -c
>ret: 1, optv: , argv: -ab1 -c
--
2.30.0
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author