Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility

X-seq: zsh-workers 48497
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dana <dana@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 09:54:53 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/48497>
In-reply-to: <F56FD538-0428-4D03-BBE2-6E53154EC0EA@dana.is>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <7FD930F4-37CD-402B-9A06-893818856199@dana.is> <CAH+w=7aAZKpT0f5LT7RaoCehyO6UZe6FimzuQqOP4o=+EwZs2w@mail.gmail.com> <F56FD538-0428-4D03-BBE2-6E53154EC0EA@dana.is>

On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 5:19 PM dana <dana@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Since you asked, off the top of my head, zsh's getopts isn't POSIX-compliant
> due to its handling of '+'-prefixed options. I think i had a patch somewhere
> to make that respect POSIX_BUILTINS

You're talking about the thread from workers/42248, which itself
mentions a thread from workers/35317.  Did none of those patches get
applied?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: dana
- sh emulation POSIX non-conformances (Was: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility)
  - From: Stephane Chazelas

References:
- [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: dana
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH] Document imperfections in POSIX/sh compatibility
  - From: dana

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author