Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Another blast from the far past: HAVE_PRCTL

X-seq: zsh-workers 48828
From: "Daniel Shahaf" <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Zsh hackers list" <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Another blast from the far past: HAVE_PRCTL
Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 20:58:04 +0000
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/48828>
In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7ZnNiahRrs_F3tg93ZmnfQTDt+a5eaFgc7W9oBoDWfZjQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7ZnNiahRrs_F3tg93ZmnfQTDt+a5eaFgc7W9oBoDWfZjQ@mail.gmail.com>

Bart Schaefer wrote on Sat, 15 May 2021 19:22 +00:00:
> Amazing how long some things have been sitting in my "git stash". :-|
> 
> https://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2014/msg01253.html
> workers/33465
> 
> Still relevant?

On Linux 4.19, `ps -e` is not changed by `jobs -Z` but is changed by
calling prctl(PR_SET_NAME, …), so it seems the patch _is_ still relevant.

I didn't actually apply it; I just attached in a debugger and called the
function manually.

Cheers,

Daniel

References:
- Another blast from the far past: HAVE_PRCTL
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author