Re: revised patch: zshmisc(1) clarify non-successful exit statuses

[Lawrence Velázquez <larryv@xxxxxxx>]

On Sun, May 9, 2021, at 3:04 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021, at 10:20 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > zeurkous@xxxxxxxx wrote on Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 18:25:12 +0200:
> > > Making another revision. A question (well, two) below. 
> > > 
> > > "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 5:19 AM <zeurkous@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +If execution fails: an error message is printed, and one of the
> > > >> +following values is returned.
> > > >
> > > > I would move this along with the sitem list to the very end, to follow
> > > > the paragraph about the command_not_found handler.
> > > >
> > > > Then change "If execution fails:" to "When there is no handler and
> > > > execution fails,".
> > > 
> > > Presuming that most people won't bother to install such a handler: isn't
> > > it better to put the more-used information first?
> > > 
> > 
> > Sounds good to me: describe the common/default case first and layer on
> > exceptions second.  Bart, WDYT?
> 
> gentle nudge

Hi, do you think you'll be able to send that updated patch soon?
No worries if not.

-- 
vq