Re: Possibly missing explanation on difference between '&>' and '> word 2>&1' with multios in manual

[Daniel Shahaf <d.s@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bart Schaefer wrote on Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 14:53:50 -0700:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 8:25 AM Jett Husher <jetthusher@xxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Did I miss something or is the explanation really not present?
> 
> It's not precisely missing, it's just implicit.  Excerpts:
> 
> "Note that the shell opens all the files to be used in the multio process
> immediately, not at the point they are about to be written."
> 
> "Note also that redirections are always expanded in order.  This happens
> regardless of the setting of the MULTIOS option, but with the option in
> effect there are additional consequences."
> 
> It's not that "&>word" all by itself is not the same as ">word 2>&1"
> alone, it's that "&>word" when combined with other redirections is not
> the same as ">word 2>&1" combined with other redirections.

So, s/not have the same effect as/not equivalent to/?

(regex to be applied to the docs sentence Jett quoted)

Cheers,

Daniel