Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.

X-seq: zsh-workers 49874
From: Jun T <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2022 12:32:41 +0900
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/49874>
In-reply-to: <082447B3-C6A4-44A1-A3D3-7FD89D707480@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <20220315163347.GA617047@zira.vinc17.org> <CAHYJk3RLBkXmQx3NbTOGK=C71uXBWGGCL2tycEHULVDr+bQ2Hg@mail.gmail.com> <082447B3-C6A4-44A1-A3D3-7FD89D707480@kba.biglobe.ne.jp>

> 2022/03/17 0:30, I wrote:
> 
> Please try the following patch.

[1] Does this patch solve the problem?

[2] Why is the test marked "expected to fail"?
What does 'F:This is considered a bugfix in zsh' mean?

If the test is expected to be run in C locale, then isn't
< Stéphane>  (a single space before S)
the "correct" result?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

References:
- Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
  - From: Vincent Lefevre
- Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- Re: Test ./E03posix.ztst was expected to fail, but passed.
  - From: Jun . T

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author