Re: [PATCH] Change documentation, dedication, loose ends

[dana <dana@xxxxxxx>]

On Sun 3 Apr 2022, at 11:34, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> I didn't find the rewrite to be significantly clearer than what I
> wrote, but obviously I might be biased.

I'm not sure the CASE_PATHS part itself is clearer, though i did like the
additional reference under NO_CASE_GLOB. Assuming nobody wants to argue
for the rest i think i may commit just that part.

On Sun 3 Apr 2022, at 11:34, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>>  compinit: A "y" response to the "Ignore ... and continue?" prompt removes
>
> It was suggested that we change this prompt, too.  Votes?

Without having looked into it super deeply, 'skip' does seem a little
clearer to me.

On Sun 3 Apr 2022, at 11:34, Bart Schaefer wrote:
>> +Incompatibilities between 5.7.1 and 5.8.1
>
> This seems wrong.  The incompatibilities are either between 5.7.1 and
> 5.8, or between 5.8 and 5.8.1

I didn't really like that either, but i was trying to match the rest of
the file (many instances of that kind of thing). Not sure if there's any
specific precedent for the 5.8 -> 5.8.1 change.

I wouldn't mind documenting somewhere exactly how these files should be
structured. In the mean time, how do you suggest i revise exactly? Would
you prefer each section to cover a single version (5.7.1 -> 5.8,
5.8 -> 5.8.1, 5.8.1 -> 5.9), or...?

On Sun 3 Apr 2022, at 11:34, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> If we're adding a sections specifically for 5.8.1, should the
> line-buffering bug be mentioned?

Is there a behaviour change there? I thought it was just a crash fix

dana