Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: ERR_RETURN doc
- X-seq: zsh-workers 51091
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Philippe Altherr <philippe.altherr@xxxxxxxxx>
- Cc: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ERR_RETURN doc
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2022 12:05:34 -0800
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/51091>
- In-reply-to: <CAGdYcht2a6oDePU_ba1Y7TZuWmWY9ELtzq7KX8jjEfuz=Zi3SQ@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <f29162cd-28d1-85ed-6a3c-9bec1fb2e13a@eastlink.ca> <CAA-Ti-hhbwZD3-aeMvy_tm5f7SKHw7XN4muJn8ymez1q7rAE_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAN=4vMpCUNgKYgSR+4rmREpA25v_sLHYcS4nfTk8EQ_0Cg5yyw@mail.gmail.com> <5d0c4e22-80b0-2fd2-ee75-6902da52d121@eastlink.ca> <CAH+w=7aeERdOcpPzTmKVQFK7HLduh2s1J9VFzumCh6W0SJFqpg@mail.gmail.com> <57e8e248-bb1a-663a-8557-e3fc13f671d4@eastlink.ca> <CAH+w=7aW9meLuEKSGsKiZMXoAd7KBc9fgakXZnB_t2iphq=BPQ@mail.gmail.com> <e35c2f14-abda-93d7-bf2c-6823d6d3215d@eastlink.ca> <CAN=4vMrZzxYVjc63DwU=Scks39FhzmK+E57XerOwusmd64QOjw@mail.gmail.com> <c2f348d1-8982-d4a4-2c78-a0dd67319b8c@eastlink.ca> <CAGdYchv9T6ByD7meADqWzdJwAF2SG2YXhasT0=+AQvV+08ZRrA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH+w=7Z-JwDrBaQtsqGXabipPwjGgFy+K03y_JaXuPYKBQzU6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAGdYcht2a6oDePU_ba1Y7TZuWmWY9ELtzq7KX8jjEfuz=Zi3SQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 11:30 AM Philippe Altherr
<philippe.altherr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The patch about the always statement makes it behave like compound statements.
A statement followed by an always-block should always behave as if the
always-block wasn't there, except in the TRY_BLOCK_ERROR cases
mentioned in the description of "always". I suppose your patches
should be tested against that.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author