Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for zsh
- X-seq: zsh-workers 51498
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for zsh
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 19:13:51 -0800
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/51498>
- In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7ZeUFAP3kpFUxuagz9iv+a98SAr4EQ4iXAFvEZBuXc_2A@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <63fdfb42fe26_9c8392b226e1f79b07046a@prd-scan-dashboard-0.mail> <CAH+w=7ZeUFAP3kpFUxuagz9iv+a98SAr4EQ4iXAFvEZBuXc_2A@mail.gmail.com>
Why am I getting this? Who set this up?
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 5:01 AM <scan-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>> CID 1521554: Control flow issues (MISSING_RESTORE)
> >>> Value of non-local "*ss" that was saved in "sav" is not restored as it was along other paths.
> 2159 return NULL;
Pointer to heap memory, not used again, no need to restore.
> /Src/params.c: 6268 in upscope()
> >>> Null-checking "pm" suggests that it may be null, but it has already been dereferenced on all paths leading to the check.
Caller shouldn't ever pass NULL. Is this going to keep complaining about it?
> *** CID 1521548: Memory - illegal accesses (USE_AFTER_FREE)
> /Src/builtin.c: 1211 in cd_new_pwd()
> 1205 zsfree(getlinknode(dirstack));
> 1206
> 1207 if (chasinglinks) {
> 1208 s = findpwd(new_pwd);
> 1209 if (s) {
> 1210 zsfree(new_pwd);
> >>> CID 1521548: Memory - illegal accesses (USE_AFTER_FREE)
> >>> Using freed pointer "s".
> 1211 new_pwd = s;
> 1212 }
This is a knock-on to the complaint about findpwd() below.
> 7181 if (meta) {
> >>> CID 1521546: Uninitialized variables (UNINIT)
> >>> Using uninitialized value "t[-1]".
> 7182 t[-1] |= 0x80;
> 7183 meta = 0;
> 7184 }
Hm, I guess "t" might not have advanced past its original starting
assignment if control passes through the #ifdef MULTIBYTE block about
60 lines earlier, without returning?
#ifdef MULTIBYTE_SUPPORT
} else if ((how & GETKEY_SINGLE_CHAR) &&
isset(MULTIBYTE) && (unsigned char) *s > 127) {
wint_t wc;
int len;
len = mb_metacharlenconv(s, &wc);
if (wc != WEOF) {
*misc = (int)wc;
return s + len;
}
#endif
> *** CID 1521545: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> /Src/Modules/param_private.c: 130 in makeprivate()
> >>> CID 1521545: Resource leaks (RESOURCE_LEAK)
> >>> Variable "gsu" going out of scope leaks the storage it points to.
Can't happen unless the definition of PM_TYPE() changes without this
code being updated.
> *** CID 1521544: Memory - illegal accesses (USE_AFTER_FREE)
> /Src/utils.c: 801 in findpwd()
> 795
> 796 if (*s == '/')
> 797 return xsymlink(s, 0);
> 798 s = tricat((pwd[1]) ? pwd : "", "/", s);
> 799 t = xsymlink(s, 0);
> 800 zsfree(s);
> >>> CID 1521544: Memory - illegal accesses (USE_AFTER_FREE)
> >>> Using freed pointer "t".
> 801 return t;
> 802 }
Not seeing how it calculates this one, I think xsymlink(s,0) is going
to end up returning either a pointer to the static mbuf[] in metafy(),
or heap memory. Anyone else see an alternative? Is it treating mbuf
as freed stack even though it is declared static?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author