Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?

X-seq: zsh-workers 51789
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Sebastian Gniazdowski <sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Stephenson <p.w.stephenson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:09:40 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/51789>
In-reply-to: <CAKc7PVCj6NFJ_BNkQcU_c6_TY=q7vP9kyF034k2250f0xWPFbg@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAKc7PVAh95GL_kx1FiACaexEHsK8PVLrJ+T4KxnKTZr=5KDXMw@mail.gmail.com> <1297534493.4668003.1685024167868@mail.virginmedia.com> <CAH+w=7ZgA=80EP5peb6sO330hj2tY58LCJ=+7Lcr464L1A-JnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKc7PVCj6NFJ_BNkQcU_c6_TY=q7vP9kyF034k2250f0xWPFbg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:02 PM Sebastian Gniazdowski
<sgniazdowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think that it does solve the problem, if the buffer settings are
> applied to external commands. I would say that they are, but your
> answer gives doubts… are they applied?

Once you fork/exec, the initialization of stdio buffers etc. is all
redone inside the new process, as far as I know.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

References:
- stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski
- Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: stdbuf -o0 -i0 via a Zsh native interface?
  - From: Sebastian Gniazdowski

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author