Re: [PATCH] Add option like tcsh's dextract

[Tim Eliseo <tre-zsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2023-08-09 10:25:39, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:25 AM Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 8/9/23, Tim Eliseo <tre-zsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Do you have any remaining questions or concerns that prevent this patch
> > > from being merged?
> > The manpage entry says:
> >    This option makes tt(pushd) using `tt(PLUS())' or `tt(-)' behave
> > like tt(cd) with tt(AUTO_PUSHD) set.
> Similar minor nit:
>
> +A push using `tt(PLUS())' or `tt(-)' will reorder by moving the specified
>
> I realize other parts of the manual are not consistent about this, but
> passive voice should be avoided, i.e., say "reorders by moving" rather
> than "will reorder".
Okay, will fix the passive voice, or maybe it’s present instead of 
future tense. Hard to keep track.
> Aside to zsh-workers in general: good grief, the bf() yodl macro is
> really inconsistently applied.  So much so that I didn't even realize
> it existed until I read this patch.  I can think of at least a few
> uses of em() that would probably be better as bf().

I used bf()  because I saw it used for other external command names. Is 
that correct?

Tim