Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes

X-seq: zsh-workers 52177
From: "Jun. T" <takimoto-j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 10:41:03 +0900
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/52177>
In-reply-to: <CAH+w=7Y3VfxuZDfSF4O05nxLFRVyvoCBBZnW0dePGBQhKe2LbA@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7avr_BmzxBSbjdhvtpngU3xaKV0yKBBge9nMOHjkGtgGg@mail.gmail.com> <EFF69F26-15E6-4B5B-8D81-C679DC51AFF3@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <071C3F0A-AE0B-4040-88FA-9E841981EDB1@kba.biglobe.ne.jp> <CAH+w=7Y3VfxuZDfSF4O05nxLFRVyvoCBBZnW0dePGBQhKe2LbA@mail.gmail.com>

> 2023/09/23 9:25, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I think this.

The patch is somewhat mis-formatted?
(it can be easily applied manually).

So ztuff() is no longer necessary?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
  - From: Bart Schaefer

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
  - From: Jun T
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
  - From: Jun T
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Consolidated nofork substitution changes
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author