Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines

X-seq: zsh-workers 52698
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Zsh hackers list <zsh-workers@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 11:45:08 -0800
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/52698>
In-reply-to: <20240306175711.t3uz2sery3b6tbjw@chazelas.org>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <CAH+w=7aFJH-5GAu6puszGKvjqN-w0sPCi6v-vGPauDHVujDnag@mail.gmail.com> <20240305065606.ccr2ieheahslcpye@chazelas.org> <CAH+w=7Yb6_eULBq6Ez6pEhtUXOqErr+aDL2BDi7zyxr8QpsTiw@mail.gmail.com> <20240306175711.t3uz2sery3b6tbjw@chazelas.org>

On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 9:57 AM Stephane Chazelas <stephane@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I hadn't realised ${ cmd } also didn't do IFS-splitting,
> so it is indeed departing a lot from command substitution and
> assuming we don't care about keep compatibility with
> ksh93/mksh/bash, I agree the proposed behaviour makes sense

If SH_WORD_SPLIT is in fact set (as when emulating) then it is
applied, so that's the other-shell-compatibility path.

> Either way or always removing all newlines or always removing one
> newline or removing one newline when not quoted are fine with me.

Thanks.  Anyone else waiting to weigh in?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
  - From: Mikael Magnusson

References:
- [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
  - From: Stephane Chazelas
- Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
  - From: Bart Schaefer
- Re: [PATCH?] Nofork and removing newlines
  - From: Stephane Chazelas

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author