On 3/20/2024 9:54 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
What I was unsure of was whether removing the return or changing the type of the wrapper function was the appropriate fix. That would require more familiarity with the code than I have (or at this time want to put in the effort to get) to answer. I mostly wanted to make others aware of the problem.On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 5:22 AM Clinton Bunch <cdb_zsh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 3/20/2024 05:19, Peter Stephenson wrote:Let's just rename it and the others in that area.I'm getting the same error with that patch applied. What I saw on the lines it errored on were return statements returning the value of a function in a wrapper function defined to return void. Perhaps, simply removing the return keyword?Yes, just removing the "return" from the void function is all that's needed.