Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()

X-seq: zsh-workers 52824
From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: James <tirtajames45@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Oliver Kiddle <opk@xxxxxxx>, zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2024 19:26:45 -0700
Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/52824>
In-reply-to: <CANDqPp35KYKZT7QkNjyVfoEtwG7gn8bJDQHfcRSfTCD6nea58g@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
References: <20240318071148.135833-1-tirtajames45@gmail.com> <36117-1711413736.217542@p2pe.Gxts.15z4> <CANDqPp35KYKZT7QkNjyVfoEtwG7gn8bJDQHfcRSfTCD6nea58g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 7:18 PM James <tirtajames45@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I think it would be better to make it a macro for now. The function call overhead may become a pessimization for small strings.

Didn't we go over this (and have a discussion about naming the macro)
a few months ago?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()
  - From: James

References:
- [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()
  - From: James Tirta Halim
- Re: [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: [PATCH v2] prefer memcpy() over strcpy()
  - From: James

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author