Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: ::= didn't respect parameter flags
- X-seq: zsh-workers 54738
- From: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: ::= didn't respect parameter flags
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 21:33:33 -0700
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.google.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; h=content-transfer-encoding:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=s1c3ZTLZeAdEJUkLK4PaXVpKnCaIH83bhLAFxrY+Ndg=; fh=SbTlPuNNxBzTkRlwWtqw/TXBY0HvGvtE97RpPp3sJPM=; b=AU9JQ/odQk7dSGor5MA3C1FAGBeMyD2AMYUL/KSENt0mBbkEvFLD7WDjC4JpvZgsu/ hYq0iuZFtRNkYXBy/rt0AfhLwdyv2S0vEUekBln7oe3ANSQ2wUfOfdcTbMFo0Dl47wwL OG+gHHNrxv5uTgVievK1yqu9Qy4v0vZee93TxWe1um0UUVD0/LKeolAeKZ7QdP2nP5Cd C3jafQRhLOJiQzenS/SoIAi1wW4slR82DQ/70th0Z7YKI8MEyK0RLH5+Q4oxNbL4EGyz ycBYAmPgBltxYdTgeUwor7+pbMosICanwcXq6ZcCCz1jukmZeVnwUySCGLCosMc9NrWe oKdA==; darn=zsh.org
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1781066026; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20240605; b=LSjk7lT6ZZVKkGXUgs0AdI/a/pWccITnjU34RwNDJL+n0ATNAytKqjm1Jw40LALI4B rp/5I932J2CB8/TJRg4razeR72RBNeWHEtHumoVT7DRMVXyNVJb3A+sUVnbLBQp+y/Gh NrLbzxEvdVCQ1LN2HoUVD4cVIJeL1r80ebla9lDEwgkp7SMSitlEvnNGxAsNOjamMMVj h8cbicMAert0CgWq5mulOcz6jaj4e4D3YpzAtRpCka42MvLfus6BM7A/O7MLIozOBIUM x4VzRqvP1uOZ8Nu7YM+8DKNOmWDQcO+eyY0Wwj0Fmr9NlPCtWMs8zxvKWDgoY3GG4m/o C2mg==
- Archived-at: <https://zsh.org/workers/54738>
- In-reply-to: <20260604071557.8072-1-mikachu@gmail.com>
- List-id: <zsh-workers.zsh.org>
- References: <CAHYJk3RPgqh54Mky+5ar6_ui7H7mNzzuuxoYhTLRtxLrQE+1yQ@mail.gmail.com> <20260604071557.8072-1-mikachu@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 12:16 AM Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We agreed that at least the latter is definitely disagreeing with what you would
> expect and the documentation.
I meant to reply to this sooner. Does this change in any way impact
the 25 "Rules" in doc section 14.3.3? Presently that doesn't mention
assignment forms at all, but there are a number of explicit orderings
of expansion flags with respect to each other and with respect to
nested expansions, and I think it could be argued that
${(A)uniquearr::=$duplicates} contains a nested expansion. Perhaps
this at least needs clarification?
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author