Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: [[ -x ]] and root
- X-seq: zsh-users 300
- From: "Colin Holmes" <colin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [[ -x ]] and root
- Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 10:57:21 -0700
Hi again,
I started this thread looking for a way to do a [[ -x file]] while
running as root. I got responses from this list (Zefram, mostly) to
the effect that access() was improperly functioning under Irix 5.3, as
it was under Linux. I posted to comp.sys.sgi.bug to find out what they
thought and here are the more useful results....
Response 1:
In article <4sedhv$305q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, holmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
write
s:
> Anyone reported that the access() call in the system library
> behaves improperly with regard to root? This has been a
> problem for me while writing root scripts under zsh.
Are you confident that zsh uses access(2) in its test -x
implementation? That would be a mistake, I believe.
The access(2) system call is intended for use by setuid
executables, trying to determine if the real id of the process,
as opposed to the effective, could access a particular file.
Implementations of test -x should stat and look at mode bits.
Response 2:
It's not a problem, it's the way it's designed and supposed
to work. As Paul says, access() has limited usefulness, and
in my experience, is often misused.
--
Dave Olson, Silicon Graphics Guru and busybody at large
So, the folks at SGI think that the test ought to be performed
in a manner other than calling access(). I doubt they are going
to do anything to change the behaviour of access() so, if the zsh
group doesn't change the nature of the test underlying -x, I need
a workaround.... Any takers?
Colin.
--
* CJ Holmes, PhD,
* Dept Neurology, UCLA School of Medicine, 4238 Reed Bldg, Box 951769
* 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1769
* ph 310-206-2101 fx 310-206-5518 email holmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author