Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
- X-seq: zsh-users 344
- From: Charles Swiger <chuck@xxxxxxx>
- To: luomat@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: zsh 3.0 pre6 VERY slow on nextstep 3.2
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 96 11:44:19 -0400
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <199608051148.HAA01867@xxxxxxxx>
- References: <199608050112.VAA22841@xxxxxxxx> <960804235458.ZM10347@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <199608051148.HAA01867@xxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: <chuck@xxxxxxx>
On Mon, 5 Aug 96, "Timothy J. Luoma" wrote:
> Would you need/like to see the compiling output?
>
> Thanks for the help, I love zsh but it really is too slow to be usable...
I tried building under NEXTSTEP 3.3. './configure' generates two core
dumps; apparently the linker chokes trying to link POSIX stuff without
'-posix', since building the test program which does
tgetent((char*)0,"vt100") coredumps using either NeXT's cc or a gcc-2.7.2 I
built.
Pressing on, I built zsh, but I didn't notice any obvious slowdowns.
-Chuck "yet-another-data-point" Swiger
Charles Swiger | chuck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | standard disclaimer
---------------+---------------------------+--------------------
I know you're an optimist if you think I'm a pessimist.
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author