Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: bindkey -s question
- X-seq: zsh-users 1471
- From: TGAPE! <tgape@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: duvall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Danek Duvall)
- Subject: Re: bindkey -s question
- Date: Sat, 18 Apr 1998 10:11:54 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <19980418015157.A25326@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Danek Duvall" at Apr 18, 98 01:51:57 am
Danek Duvall wrote:
>
> I'm trying to bind ^L to a key sequence that will reset my xterm saved
> lines. The escape sequence ^[c does the trick if I do
>
> echo -n c
>
> at the command line. However, if I try
>
> bindkey -s "^L" "echo -n ^[c"
>
> it just prints a new prompt as if I'd typed return. (Note I've typed all
> the control charaters using ^V first; I'm just typing them safely here.)
^^
Right here's your key - -s puts the keys on the line as if you typed
them. Try typing 'echo -n ^[c' on the command line and see what
happens. Anyway, I think 'echo -n ^V^O' is what you really want; you
then don't need to associate it with clear-screen.
> I managed to get somewhat the behavior I want by
>
> zle -N clear-screen2
> function clear-screen2 () { echo -n ^[c; zle clear-screen }
> bindkey "^L" clear-screen2
>
> Without the call to clear-screen, the prompt doesn't get printed, but with
> it there's a slight flash.
Which tells you what would happen with what you're trying with the
bindkey you're asking about - you'd get no prompt.
I handle this with
alias sanity='echo ^O; stty sane; stty -erase ^H'
I avoid the situation enough that a keybinding is not called for.
Considering the number of actual terminal lockups available from the
same source as your messed up charset, I think avoidance is probably a
good idea. (I saw one of those happen to a sysadmin at work, who was on
console on a machine which must not go down. Oops. Funny thing was, he
didn't realize it was a binary file until I showed it to him with less.
And some people wonder why I hate /bin/more with a passion.)
> I'm using xterm-70, if that makes any difference.
It does - it means you're talking about a dec-vt style terminal, which
is what I know best. You'll only have problems applying this to
something weird like wyse terminals (what the hey?!?) or ansi
(standards? Who ever follows standards?) (though dec-vt style is close
enough to ansi that it might carry over.)
Ed
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author