Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: alternative method for a simple for

X-seq: zsh-users 14381
From: Sebastian Stark <seb-zsh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Joke de Buhr <joke.de.buhr@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: alternative method for a simple for
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:13:44 +0200
Cc: zsh-users@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200909151040.35397.joke.de.buhr@xxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-users-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20090915125419.3528@binki> <200909151040.35397.joke.de.buhr@xxxxxxxxx>


On 15.09.2009, at 10:40, Joke de Buhr wrote:

On Tuesday 15 September 2009 05:54:19 d.henman wrote:

Maybe you want to use the short version of for. It's rather short

 for file (*wav) ffmpeg -b 160k -i $file $file:r.mp3

or

 for file (*wav) { ffmpeg -b 160k -i $file $file:r.mp3 }

That's short and clear syntax.


It is also incompatible and deprecated syntax :)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alternative method for a simple for
  - From: Mikael Magnusson
- Re: alternative method for a simple for
  - From: Nikolai Weibull

References:
- alternative method for a simple for
  - From: d.henman
- Re: alternative method for a simple for
  - From: Joke de Buhr

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author