On 01/03/2015 04:41 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
Ah, right. I wasn't sure that would pass muster, since you are skeptical of it. But, for arguments sake, why not do for -m whatOn Jan 3, 2:42pm, Ray Andrews wrote: } } I'll keep those **argv != '/' tests here, once I figure out how to sneak } them past git. Peter already pushed the one for the -a option, so you should just be able to "git pull" that one.
has been done for -a? Mind ... they are rather different things; -a is the crux of it.