Re: off topic

[Bart Schaefer <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Dec 11,  9:07am, Ray Andrews wrote:
}
} Pardon, I'm out of my depth here so just ignore this, but why would we 
} want to ignore user options and such?

So that the writer of the plugin doesn't have to worry about his code
being misinterpreted because of the user's idiosyncracies.

Note the suggestion is to clean up the way the plugin code is initially
parsed, not what happens when it runs.