Re: Do you recognize this zshrc.d naming scheme?

[<Nathan.Pope@xxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

> On 21 Jan 2019, at 02:35, René Wilhelm <asdf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> This is how my $ZDOTDIR/functions.d/ looks like. Works out really well and
> grows since 1999. There is no fixed scheme, rather each file is just a
> bucket full of functions and stuff. New things usually end up in
> 90-random*.sh. Startup time is still relatively low, at
> around 0.14570188522338867 seconds. It is mostly a huge mess, but I feel
> very at home in it.
> 
> % wc -l *.sh
> 
>       5 00-defaults.sh
>      43 00-quotes.sh
>      67 00-utils.sh
>      57 10-zsh-completion.sh
>      20 10-zsh-contrib.sh
>      16 10-zsh-syntax-highlighting.sh
>      93 10-zsh.sh
>      52 20-archlinux.sh
>      62 20-darwin.sh
>     104 20-debian.sh
>     156 20-gentoo.sh
>       5 20-linux.sh
>      21 20-osx-iterm.sh
>      21 20-osx-launchd.sh
>     189 20-osx.sh
>      17 30-gpg.sh
>       1 30-pass.sh
>       6 40-go.sh
>       5 40-kotlin.sh
>     195 40-node.sh
>      24 40-perl.sh
>      27 40-python.sh
>       3 40-ruby.sh
>       9 40-rust.sh
>      22 50-admin.sh
>      62 50-aliases.sh
>      16 50-android.sh
>      41 50-api.sh
>       2 50-api_keys.sh
>     149 50-backup.sh
>      64 50-beep.sh
>       5 50-beet.sh
>      98 50-bidos.sh
>      14 50-calc.sh
>       8 50-camera.sh
>      25 50-chroot.sh
>       5 50-clipboard.sh
>      17 50-colors.sh
>      48 50-copypaste.sh
>      74 50-datetime.sh
>      16 50-debug-audio.sh
>     113 50-dev.sh
>      22 50-dev2.sh
>      42 50-development.sh
>      55 50-dkb.sh
>      20 50-dotfiles.sh
>      75 50-dslr.sh
>     165 50-editor.sh
>      18 50-environment.sh
>      16 50-evil.sh
>       5 50-favs.sh
>      71 50-find.sh
>      14 50-games.sh
>      59 50-glitch.sh
>      12 50-global-aliases.sh
>      14 50-globalias.sh
>      14 50-gtd.sh
>      38 50-history.sh
>      23 50-homebrew.sh
>       9 50-init.sh
>      14 50-iptables.sh
>      15 50-keyboard.sh
>       5 50-local.sh
>      43 50-locate.sh
>      44 50-mail.sh
>     141 50-network.sh
>       9 50-notes.sh
>      18 50-npm.sh
>       3 50-pager.sh
>      28 50-pdf.sh
>       1 50-pf.sh
>      61 50-pi.sh
>      13 50-print.sh
>      32 50-private.sh
>       1 50-react-native.sh
>       9 50-redux.sh
>       1 50-regexp.sh
>      28 50-setup.sh
>     236 50-solfeggio.sh
>       4 50-string-manipulation.sh
>       4 50-string-manipulation2.sh
>      13 50-sudo.sh
>      29 50-uniko.sh
>      24 50-update.sh
>      14 50-utils.sh
>       8 50-webdev-auth.sh
>     118 50-webdev.sh
>      11 50-websearch.sh
>     112 50-write.sh
>       2 50-xorg.sh
>      10 50-youtube.sh
>      43 70-bookmarks.sh
>      11 70-bspwm.sh
>      17 70-dmenu.sh
>      37 70-docker.sh
>       2 70-dtach.sh
>      26 70-dwm.sh
>      66 70-fzf.sh
>     133 70-git.sh
>       9 70-imagemagick.sh
>     231 70-latex.sh
>     171 70-mpd.sh
>      11 70-openvpn.sh
>       8 70-osascript.sh
>      10 70-postgresql.sh
>       1 70-ranger.sh
>       7 70-reflex.sh
>      22 70-selecta.sh
>      16 70-sencha.sh
>       6 70-sf.sh
>       8 70-systemctl.sh
>      29 70-tags.sh
>      69 70-tmux.sh
>      10 70-wu.sh
>       1 70-xdg.sh
>      10 70-z.sh
>      19 80-liveandgov.sh
>      27 80-montaigne.sh
>     587 90-random0.sh
>      81 90-random1.sh
>      81 90-random2.sh
>       4 90-random3.sh
>       6 90-random4.sh
>      45 90-random5.sh
>     136 90-random6.sh
>      17 90-random7.sh
>     281 90-random8.sh
>      40 90-random9.sh
>       7 99-todo.sh
>     170 XX-alias.sh
>     117 colors.sh
>      41 gpg-agent.plugin.sh
>      37 spectrum.sh
>    6350 total
> 

Some of these look like they could be very useful -
do you make any of these public?

-Nathan

> 
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 12:36, Robert Spencer <robert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Apologies for the top posting I'm on my phone and it tends to mangle
>> anything else.
>> 
>> The overall concept makes sense, not the execution in this case.
>> 
>> I'm struggling to guess what the original plan was with the naming scheme
>> sections.
>> 
>> 10 makes sense, local variables.
>> 20 what did this used to be?
>> 30 history, but is 35 really related?
>> 40 term settings? But 42 is aliases, that I would have expected in the
>> 90's.
>> 50 completion, but then what is 55 doing there.
>> 60 prompt, but I'm not sure that 65 belongs here.
>> 70 variables
>> 80 oh-my-zsh, but then why doesn't 85-functions have its own section?
>> 90 what did this section used to be? Misc? 92 is aliases, which again, I
>> would expect to have its own section. Although it makes sense that it's
>> last.
>> 
>> I'm hoping if I can find the upstream source it will all make sense.
>> 
>> What naming scheme do you use?
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019, 12:36 Magnus Woldrich <m@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> 
>>>> As it says in the subject line, do you recognize this zshrc.d naming
>>> scheme?
>>> 
>>>> 10-locals.zsh
>>>> 30-history-oh-my-zsh.zsh
>>>> 32-history.zsh
>>>> 35-long-running.zsh
>>>> 40-term.zsh
>>>> 42-dircolors.zsh
>>> 
>>> I use something similar but isn't it just common sense so that we can
>>> iterate
>>> the files and load them in the correct order?
>>> 
>>