Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: zsh-3.0-pre1 released
- X-seq: zsh-workers 1465
- From: Zefram <A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx (Zoltan Hidvegi)
- Subject: Re: zsh-3.0-pre1 released
- Date: Fri, 28 Jun 1996 18:21:31 +0100 (BST)
- Cc: A.Main@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <199606281710.TAA02488@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> from "Zoltan Hidvegi" at Jun 28, 96 07:10:13 pm
>It's not me who made this change. This comes from Clive's texinfo
>documentation. ispell says that depreciate is correct. I assume it has
>the same meaning as deprecate. I do not know enough about English to
>decide which is better.
"depreciate" and "deprecate" are both valid English words. They have
completely different meanings, and the appropriate one here is
"deprecate".
>I'm still thinking about adding some or all of them to the baseline. POSIX
>requires export -p and readonly -p. But I do not find any patches to
>typeset. Did I lost it or you'v never sent such a patch?
I've not done a typeset -M patch yet. I was planning to wait until the
ones I've sent so far have got in. I have a list of builtins waiting
to have this option added, but while the patches aren't being used
there's not much point working on it.
Btw, the reason I haven't sent any patches in the last couple of weeks
is that my computer is not in a very usable state right now. The
graphics card is sulking, and the serial card is only sending data in
one direction (out). This means that I can do the minimal admin tasks
needed to configure the software side of the serial I/O, but it's not
very conducive to editing source. :-) I should be back in action
within a week.
-zefram
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author