Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: bug with "compctl -L" in 3.0.1

X-seq: zsh-workers 2452
From: Zoltan Hidvegi <hzoli@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: pws@xxxxxx (Peter Stephenson)
Subject: Re: bug with "compctl -L" in 3.0.1
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 16:06:46 +0100 (MET)
Cc: fclim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <199611221108.MAA21377@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from Peter Stephenson at "Nov 22, 96 12:08:53 pm"
Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary
Phone: (36 1)2669833 ext: 2667, home phone: (36 1) 2752368

Peter Stephenson wrote:
> Fung-Chai Lim wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Although I did a ``compctl -e disable'', ``compctl -L disable''
> > returns ``compctl disable''.  So does ``compctl''.  This bug
> > is in both versions 3.0.0 and 3.0.1.
> 
> The manual page says -e has no effect without -d, so on its own it's
> completely ignored and not even stored: you would need -de (I don't
> know why it was done like that).  However, since its function is to

Because it is the default.  The manual says:

          -e    Without -d this option has no effect.   Otherwise
               this can be combined with -F, -B, -w, -a, -R and -
               G to get names of  functions,  builtins,  reserved
               words or aliases even if they are disabled.

It may be changed to -e combined with -F, -B ... lists enabled ... but
that's the default unless -d is also given.  So in fact it has no effect
without -d.

Zoltan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: bug with "compctl -L" in 3.0.1
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- Re: bug with "compctl -L" in 3.0.1
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author