Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: Explanation for no completion candidates.

X-seq: zsh-workers 4462
From: Tanaka Akira <akr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Explanation for no completion candidates.
Date: 28 Oct 1998 11:38:39 +0900
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: "Bart Schaefer"'s message of "Mon, 26 Oct 1998 21:04:04 -0800"
References: <rsqemrueps9.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <981026210405.ZM12601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

In article <981026210405.ZM12601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
  "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> > However, zsh-3.0.5 and zsh-3.1.4 has different behavior on "-X".
> 
> I think that's on purpose ... search the zsh-workers archive for the
> pattern
> 	compctl;explanation
> and you'll see quite a bit of discussion about it.  The end of that thread
> seems to imply that your patch should not be used.

OK. I understand the purpose and 3.1.4 behavior.

Thanks.
-- 
[Tanaka Akira]

References:
- Explanation for no completion candidates.
  - From: Tanaka Akira
- Re: Explanation for no completion candidates.
  - From: Bart Schaefer

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author