Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: completion or'ing and grouping
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4537
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: completion or'ing and grouping
- Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1998 17:35:01 +0100
- In-reply-to: "Sven Wischnowsky"'s message of "Wed, 04 Nov 1998 08:56:16 NFT." <199811040756.IAA28828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Excellent, everything seems to be working at the moment with the new
patches (though I expect you'll be hearing from me again...).
For some reason the mail system screwed up that last patch and I
get to get it from the archive. Strange. (Is there a way of
retrieving a patch as plain text, i.e. before HTMLifying? Otherwise
back-conversion is liable to screw up whitespace.)
One thing worried me a bit: this hunk from zle_tricky.c
*** 4791,4796 ****
--- 4800,4808 ----
int ics = cs, ocs, pl = 0, l, lp, ls;
char *ps;
Cline lc;
+
+ if (!ainfo)
+ return;
fixsuffix();
didn't agree with what I had before, which came from the
patch-match.gz patch (natch). Namely, the fixsuffix() wasn't there in
what that patch introduced. I just added it by hand.
Secondly, after I applied patch-match.gz, completion did nothing
whatsoever. After panicking I remembered compctl -T. But according
to my initialisation files, I never had a compctl -T before, and when
zsh started up, compctl -T -q was in effect (why?) If this is
intentional, hadn't that better now be compctl -T -q -tc? Otherwise
we're going to have a very large number of irate users.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tel: +39 050 844536
WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/
Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarotti 2, 56100 Pisa, Italy
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author