Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: PATCH: completion or'ing and grouping
- X-seq: zsh-workers 4540
- From: "Bart Schaefer" <schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PATCH: completion or'ing and grouping
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 10:20:03 -0800
- In-reply-to: <9811041635.AA41692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- References: <9811041635.AA41692@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Nov 4, 5:35pm, Peter Stephenson wrote:
} Subject: Re: PATCH: completion or'ing and grouping
}
} .... after I applied patch-match.gz, completion did nothing
} whatsoever. After panicking I remembered compctl -T. But according
} to my initialisation files, I never had a compctl -T before, and when
} zsh started up, compctl -T -q was in effect (why?) If this is
} intentional, hadn't that better now be compctl -T -q -tc? Otherwise
} we're going to have a very large number of irate users.
It can't be right for compctl -T -q to be in effect all the time. That
would either make everything act as if autoremoveslash were set, or it
would be meaningless because there's no -S along with it. I haven't got
caught up on all this stuff yet so I don't know which.
--
Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises
http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author