Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: new SourceForge terms

X-seq: zsh-workers 16631
From: Clint Adams <clint@xxxxxxx>
To: Zefram <zefram@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: new SourceForge terms
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:33:25 -0500
Cc: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20020213170003.GB30080@xxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <20020213170003.GB30080@xxxxxxxx>

> Do we want to keep zsh hosted at SourceForge?  For me personally, item 1
> alone is enough to want to remove my account.  Item 5 also seems pretty
> serious, and 2-4 are dangerous.

I think Oliver touched on the practical points in 16240; we can all
back up the CVS repository, and do minimal reconstruction should things
go extremely awry.

I think we'd probably have little to lose by pre-emptively moving to
savannah/subversions at gnu.org, however, and it seems a pretty good bet
that corporate whims will not be threatening their quality of their
services.

If we are willing to forego the other SourceForge services as well,
I'm pretty sure I could find us several other places to keep our CVS
repository.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: new SourceForge terms
  - From: Oliver Kiddle
- Re: new SourceForge terms
  - From: Zefram

References:
- new SourceForge terms
  - From: Zefram

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author