Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Y test failures (zpty)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 16811
- From: Sven Wischnowsky <wischnow@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Y test failures (zpty)
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 09:42:56 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1020311192523.ZM27256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20020311053241.GA9027@xxxxxxxx> <1020311182942.ZM27214@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020311190231.GA21327@xxxxxxxx> <1020311192523.ZM27256@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mar 11, 2:02pm, Clint Adams wrote:
> }
> } I have Unix98 ptys in /dev/pts (this is what nearly everything uses),
> } and I have /dev/pty?? as compatibility symlinks to /dev/pty/m[0-9]+.
>
> Is it possible that all the /dev/pty?? terminals are simply used up?
First: I have 2.4.19pre1 with glibc 2.2.4, too, on my laptop and it
works fine.
I once had a similar problem on that Digital Unix box. It turned out
that for some reason a /dev/ptyXX was free but the corresponding
/dev/ttyXX was not writable by anyone else than root. That made
get_pty() fail, of course.
Maybe we should change that function to re-try /dev/pty's in that
case? Haven't seen that problem anywhere else, though.
Bye
Sven
--
Sven Wischnowsky wischnow@xxxxxxxxx
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author