Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: broken pipe with prompt -h
- X-seq: zsh-workers 17409
- From: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: broken pipe with prompt -h
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:12:28 +0100
- In-reply-to: <1020703192124.ZM19240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; from schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 07:21:24PM +0000
- Mail-followup-to: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20020629123440.A28494@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020629171715.ZM8921@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20020703180839.A21276@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1020703192124.ZM19240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: Adam Spiers <adam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: "Adam Spiers,,07775562717,020 88 30 30 35" <adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Bart Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Jul 3, 6:08pm, Adam Spiers wrote:
> } Subject: Re: broken pipe with prompt -h
> }
> } Bart Schaefer (schaefer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> } >
> } > This is a result of the changes in zsh-workers/16503 to cause bin_print()
> } > to report write errors. There was a follow-on patch in 16556 to suppress
> } > the errors when stdout is closed. EPIPE might be another error worthy of
> } > suppression.
> }
> } I just upgraded from RedHat 7.3's rpm of 4.0.4 to 4.1.0-dev-5 and the
> } warning's gone. Was that supposed to happen?
>
> I don't know. Based on looking at a CVS diff of 4.0.4 --> current, I'm
> surprised RedHat's version gave the error at all. They may have applied
> some patches?
Nope, no patches. Here's the source tree in question if it's any use:
a96a467d332071cad162b0b010f0d19e cvs/redhat/SOURCES/zsh-4.0.4.tar.bz2
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author