Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: autoconf 2.5 (Re: PATCH: terminfo horor)
- X-seq: zsh-workers 19325
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx (Zsh hackers list)
- Subject: Re: autoconf 2.5 (Re: PATCH: terminfo horor)
- Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 11:14:11 +0000
- In-reply-to: "Oliver Kiddle"'s message of "Fri, 19 Dec 2003 09:59:31 +0100." <3816.1071824371@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
Oliver Kiddle wrote:
> This line of the patch looks suspicious:
>
> +link='if test "x$ac_cv_func_tigetstr" = xyes -a "x$ac_cv_header_curses_h"; t
> hen
>
> Testing just "x$ac_cv_header_curses_h" will always be true. Did you
> intend an ` = xyes' or ` = xno' in there?
Aha, this may be why Mads was seeing problems. Although it should still
compile the module without the curses stuff as a fallback, so I'm
not convinced...
Mads Martin Joergensen <mmj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ok, I've tweaked the buildenvironment to not having ncurses-devel, and
> without it:
>
> gcc -s -rdynamic -o zsh main.o `cat stamp-modobjs` -ldl -lnsl -lm -lc
> utils.o(.text+0x2aa9): In function `gettempname':
> : the use of `mktemp' is dangerous, better use `mkstemp'
> init.o(.text+0x1277): In function `init_term':
> : undefined reference to `tgetent'
Is termcap still available? I can't see it in the link line, which is
suspicious. What did configure say when it was looking for tgetent
and tigetflag (from config.log)?
Oliver:
> The configure script is creating config.modules twice. Second time
> round when evaluating $link using the code in terminfo.mdd,
> $ac_cv_func_tigetstr was unset. It seems the configure script runs
> config.status. By running configure with --no-create, it was happy to
> build terminfo.so. Switching from autoconf 2.57 to 2.13 also solved the
> issue.
I thought it stored the configure variables somewhere? I haven't seen this
problem for some reason. I've got 2.50 here and something later at home.
> We really ought to ditch support for autoconf 2.13 in the 4.1 branch.
> Not having a mixture will just make things simpler.
Yes, I was thinking that.
pws
**********************************************************************
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by
persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
prohibited.
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
delete the material from any computer.
**********************************************************************
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author