Zsh Mailing List Archive Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author

Re: setting resource limits

X-seq: zsh-workers 20042
From: Wayne Davison <wayned@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: setting resource limits
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 08:42:06 -0700
Cc: Zsh workers <zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <200406141521.i5EFLolC019193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
References: <200406141308.i5ED81Kl015224@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200406141521.i5EFLolC019193@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> +		case 'N':
> +		    if (options[1]) {
> +			res = (int)zstrtol(options+1, NULL, 10);
> +			argv++;

That argv++ looks wrong to me -- doesn't that lose an arg when the
number is specified immediately after the -N?  (I didn't actually
test it to see.)

..wayne..

Follow-Ups:
- Re: setting resource limits
  - From: Peter Stephenson

References:
- Re: setting resource limits
  - From: Peter Stephenson
- Re: setting resource limits
  - From: Peter Stephenson

Messages sorted by: Reverse Date, Date, Thread, Author