Re: setting resource limits

[Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>]

Wayne Davison wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > +		case 'N':
> > +		    if (options[1]) {
> > +			res = (int)zstrtol(options+1, NULL, 10);
> > +			argv++;
> 
> That argv++ looks wrong to me -- doesn't that lose an arg when the
> number is specified immediately after the -N?  (I didn't actually
> test it to see.)

You're right, argv has already been updated and doesn't need it
again at that point.

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>                  Software Engineer
CSR Ltd., Science Park, Milton Road,
Cambridge, CB4 0WH, UK                          Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070


**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************