Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Parse errors don't cause a non-zero exit code?
- X-seq: zsh-workers 21127
- From: Felipe Kellermann <stdfk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Parse errors don't cause a non-zero exit code?
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:50:09 -0300 (BRST)
- In-reply-to: <200504011208.j31C86Qo018462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <20050329231719.GH51674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200504011208.j31C86Qo018462@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005 1:08pm +0100, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> builtin/function returns status X" is a perfectly natural way of saying
> "returns the exit status X" given that the command doesn't actually exit
> (in the UNIX sense). In other words, I don't think I want to play any
> more.
Hi Peter,
About this issue, I have a long-term question about the exit status of zsh
when it gets passed an script as argument:
% zsh a
a: can't open input file: a
% print $?
1
% a
zsh: command not found: a
% print $?
127
%
I am aware that the standard isn't very clear in this respect, but most
shells explicitly interpret both cases the same way, returning 127 when
the shell gets a command as an argument.
$ ksh --version
version sh (AT&T Labs Research) 1993-12-28 q
$ ksh a
ksh: line 1: a: not found
$ echo $?
127
$
$ bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.00.0(1)-release (i586-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
$ bash a
bash: a: No such file or directory
$ echo $?
127
$
I have recently talked with Michael Rendell about this issue on pdksh and
he OK'ed the patch I sent to him, though he is not planning to make a new
release of pdksh :-)
--
Felipe Kellermann
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author