Zsh Mailing List Archive
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author
Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
- X-seq: zsh-workers 24383
- From: Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx>
- To: zsh-workers@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Segfault with newer .zwc
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 09:50:23 +0000
- In-reply-to: <20080109191236.GB32394@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Mailing-list: contact zsh-workers-help@xxxxxxxxxx; run by ezmlm
- References: <slrnfo4ov7.cgh.joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080108095306.5475d009@news01> <20080109191236.GB32394@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Clint Adams wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:53:06AM +0000, Peter Stephenson wrote:
> > > Debian (last Changelog entry is 2007-12-27). When using this file with
> > > zsh from the zsh package (last Changelog entry is 2007-12-20) it crashes.
> >
> > Most of the time this doesn't matter but if there is a change in parsing it
> > can make a difference.
>
> Was there a parsing change between 12-20 and 12-27?
Not obviously, but if the complaint is that a wordcode file works with
one release but not another, which is how I read it, that's what's going
on.
> I could inject a datestamp into the version string if this is a
> significant issue.
That's probably a sensible idea, though to avoid confusing is-at-least
it would be best if it only appeared if there was a dev-N before it.
--
Peter Stephenson <pws@xxxxxxx> Software Engineer
CSR PLC, Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road
Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070
Messages sorted by:
Reverse Date,
Date,
Thread,
Author